DLP 3D Printing Dental Crown Resin: Formula & Process Guide

banner

DLP 3D Printing Dental Crown Resin: Formula & Process Guide

Ultimate Guide to DLP 3D Printing Dental Crown Resin: Formula & Process Optimization with SINOMER Materials

The rapid advancement of digital dentistry has been significantly propelled by Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D printing technology, renowned for its high efficiency and precision in fabricating dental restorations like crowns and bridges. However, a core challenge remains: developing resin materials that offer both excellent printability and the mechanical strength to withstand the complex stresses of the oral environment.

A recent, systematic study provides a clear solution. Focusing on a material system built around SINOMER UDMA and SINOMER PEG400DMA as the resin matrix, and SINOCURE 2425 as the photoinitiator, this research conducted a series of rigorous comparative experiments. It successfully identified the optimal material formulation and precisely defined the "golden parameters" for DLP printing.

Part 1: Core Formula Optimization – Striking the Balance Between Strength and Fluidity

The foundation of the study is the resin matrix itself. While UDMA is crucial for providing mechanical strength, its high viscosity can hinder printability. PEG400DMA acts as a diluent to improve flow but can compromise strength if not proportioned correctly. The first critical comparison addressed this balance.

Table 1: Effect of Different UDMA/PEG400DMA Ratios on Resin Viscosity

Material Ratio (UDMA:PEG400DMA)AbbreviationViscosity (mPa·s)
8 : 2U8P2Too high, not detailed
7 : 3U7P31253
6 : 4U6P4701
5 : 5U5P5407
4 : 6U4P6Further decreases
3 : 7U3P7Further decreases
2 : 8U2P8Further decreases

Conclusion: The 6:4 ratio was identified as optimal, achieving the best balance between a printable viscosity (701 mPa·s) and sufficient UDMA content to maintain structural strength.

Part 2: Filler Reinforcement – Determining the Optimal Nano-SiO₂ Loading

To enhance the resin's hardness and wear resistance, silanized nano-silica (SiO₂) was introduced as a filler. The key was determining the optimal loading (solid content), as it significantly affects the slurry's rheology—its behavior during spreading and layer deposition.

The study compared slurries with four different solid contents (14%, 18%, 22%, 26%) at a shear rate simulating the printing process (10 s⁻¹):

  • At 26% solid content, viscosity was 12.77 Pa·s, exceeding the typical DLP printing limit of 10 Pa·s, indicating poor flow.

  • At 22% solid content, viscosity was below 10 Pa·s, and the slurry exhibited excellent "shear-thinning" behavior (becoming thinner under shear for spreading and thicker when static to hold shape), confirming it as the optimal solid content for printability.

Thus, the finalized base slurry formula is: SINOMER UDMA and PEG400DMA at a 6:4 ratio, blended with 22% nano-SiO₂ and 1% photoinitiator SINOCURE 2425.

Part 3: In-Depth Printing Parameter Optimization: A Four-Step Process to the "Golden Settings"

With the formula established, the research proceeded to optimize the printing process. The team systematically compared the impact of four key parameters on the flexural strength of printed parts, using the optimized slurry.

Table 2: Comparative Optimization of Key DLP Printing Parameters and Final Results

ParameterTest RangeOptimal ValueFlexural Strength (MPa)Key Finding
Exposure Intensity14 - 29 mW/cm²20 mW/cm²132.39 ± 8.92Strength peaked here. Higher intensity caused internal stress and reduced strength.
Layer Exposure Time2.0 - 4.0 s3.0 s131.73 ± 9.433.0s achieved sufficient curing. Longer exposure provided no significant gain.
Post-Curing Time15 - 90 min30 min126.23 ± 8.55Strength stabilized after 30 minutes. Longer post-curing was unnecessary.
Layer Thickness25, 50, 100 μm50 μmBest PerformanceBest matched the light penetration depth (119.79 μm), yielding the strongest interlayer adhesion.

Photocuring Property Note: Calculations determined the slurry's critical exposure energy (Ec) to be 25.54 mJ/cm² and its light penetration depth (Dp) to be 119.79 μm. The optimal exposure energy (20 mW/cm² × 3.0 s = 60 mJ/cm²) is about 2.35 times Ec, ensuring complete curing.

Summary and Practical Value

This research, through a series of interconnected comparative experiments, provides a complete optimization roadmap from material science to process engineering:

  1. Material Formula: Establishes the optimal system: SINOMER UDMA/PEG400DMA (6:4) matrix, reinforced with 22% nano-SiO₂, and initiated by SINOCURE 2425.

  2. Printing Process: Defines the precise "golden parameters" for DLP printing: Exposure Intensity: 20 mW/cm², Exposure Time: 3.0 s, Post-Curing: 30 min, Layer Thickness: 50 μm.

Under this optimized protocol, the DLP-printed dental crown and bridge resin demonstrates a flexural strength exceeding 130 MPa. This provides reliable data and a practical process blueprint for meeting the long-term mechanical demands of oral restorations. The study not only validates the excellent performance of SINOMER and SINOCURE material systems in advanced digital dentistry but also offers a feasible, high-strength, high-precision digital manufacturing solution for clinical application.



+86 15550440621
+8615668330235
info@sinocurechem.com
Your custom formulation expert:
from monomer to polymer, we deconstruct every possibility!
©2025 Sinocure Chemical Group All Rights Reserved. CNZZ